Marriott v. Schultheis

553 So. 2d 1316, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2914, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6985, 1989 WL 149641
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1989·No. No. 88-2045·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

BASKIN, Judge.

Finding that no genuine issue of material fact remains for decision, we affirm the summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, [1317] 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). A mortgagor, has a right of redemption of the realty until certificate of title is issued to another. See Allstate Mortgage Corp. v. Strasser, 277 So.2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA), aff'd, 286 So.2d 201 (Fla.1973); Akeley v. Miller, 264 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 269 So.2d 369 (Fla.1972); Cooper Smith Properties, Ltd. v. Flower’s Baking Co. of Fla., Inc., 432 So.2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA), petition for review dismissed, 438 So.2d 831 (Fla.1983). In this case, Marriott “sold” his home to Schultheis on February 26, 1982. Unfortunately, the Mishkins had already purchased the property in foreclosure and assigned their interest to Schultheis. The certificate of title was issued on the 21st of February, a full 5 days before the Marriott-Schultheis sale. Thus, at the time Marriott purported to sell his home to Schultheis, his right of redemption had been extinguished. The Mishkins’ purchase of the property at foreclosure sale obviates the need to decide whether Schultheis promised to pay Marriott $60,000.

Affirmed.

JORGENSON, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marriott v. Schultheis, 553 So. 2d 1316, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2914, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6985, 1989 WL 149641 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

553 So. 2d 1316 (Marriott v. Schultheis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CSB Realty, Inc. v. Eurobuilding Corp.
625 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
CCC Properties, Inc. v. Kane
582 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)