Marriage of Kinney
This text of Marriage of Kinney (Marriage of Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 96-689
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
IN RE MARRIAGE OF
JACK N. KINNEY,
Petitioner and Respondent,
and
SANDRA L. ROBERTS NELSON-KINNEY,
Respondent and Appellant.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, In and for the County of Jefferson, The Honorable Frank M. Davis, Judge presiding.
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellant:
Sandra L. Roberts Nelson-Kinney, Pro Se, Clancy, Montana
For Respondent:
Eric Rasmusson, Attorney at Law, Boulder, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: May 22, 1997 Decided: June 9 I 1997 Filed: MEMORANDUM
Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1995 Internal
Operating Rules, the following decisionshallnot be cited asprecedentand shall be published
by its filing as a public document with the Clerk of the SupremeCourt and by a report of its
result to State Reporter Publishing Company and West Publishing Company.
This is an appeal,pro se, by SandraL. Roberts Nelson-Kinney. Sandraappealsfrom
the final decreeof dissolution issuedby the Fifth Judicial District Court, Jefferson County.
She disagreeswith the distribution of real property. We affirm.
The parties were married on January 19, 1982, and their marriage was dissolved on
October 9, 1991. The October 9, 1991, decreeof dissolution disposedof all matters except
the issueof disposition of real property, due to the interest of a third party. The real property
at issue is located at 78 and 80 Alhambra Road, Clancy, Montana.
On or about April 9, 1996, Jack N. Kinney filed his request to finalize the decree of
dissolution. The District Court held a hearing on May 2, 1996. After the hearing, the
District Court entered findings of fact, conclusionsof law, and a final decree of dissolution.
The District Court awarded the real property at issueto Jack.
Following entry ofthe District Court’s findings of fact, conclusionsof law, and decree,
Sandra, appearing pro se, filed an appeal. This Court summarizes Sandra’sassertions,
statements,and arguments in her initial brief as follows: (1) alleged marital misconduct by
Jack, (2) Sandra’sallegeddesireto reconcile with Jack; (3) re-open the entire proceedings,
including the 1991decreeof dissolution; (4) District Court JudgeFrank M. Davis, attorney
2 Bob Cummings, counselfor Jack, and the entire legal systemhasconspiredto deprive Sandra
of the Clancy property; (5) other judicial proceedings she was involved with in some
capacity; (6) allegationsthat Jackphysically, sexually, and emotionally abusedSandraduring
the course of the marriage; and (7) Jack’salleged link to white supremacist groups. This
Court concludes that the foregoing arguments are irrelevant and do not concern the issue
before this Court.
In the District Court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree, Judge Davis
found that Jack and his brother, Ken, purchasedthe real property in July 1981, and that they
made all the payments and improvements thereon. The District Court determined that there
was no credible or admissibleevidenceof any financial contribution made by Sandrafor the
purchaseof the property. The District Court also consideredsuch factors as the length of the
marriage, the comparative agesand health, employment statusand skills, respective income,
respective contributions, and source of property. These factors, as set forth in 5 40-4-202,
MCA, were resolved by the District Court in favor of Jack and against Sandra.
Having reviewed the entire record in this case, we conclude that there was no
reversible error committed by the trial court and we agreewith the District Court’s rationale
and decisionin its findings of fact and conclusionsof law datedNovember 6, 1996,and final
decree of dissolution entered on November 22, 1996.
Affirmed.
3 June 9, 1997
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the following certified order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the following named:
SANDRA L. ROBERTS NELSON-KINNEY 80 OLD ALHAMBRA ROAD CLANCY MT 59634
ERIC RASMUSSON ATTORNEY AT LAW PO BOX 581 BOULDER MT 59632-0587
ED SMITH CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marriage of Kinney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marriage-of-kinney-mont-1997.