Marriage of King v. Loss

99 S.W.3d 494, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 322
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 2003·No. No. ED 79958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Barbara Ann Loss, n/k/a Barbara Ann King, appeals from the trial court’s judgment: (1) finding the college expense provision in the decree of dissolution was indefinite and unenforceable; and (2) denying her request for attorneys’ fees.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marriage of King v. Loss, 99 S.W.3d 494, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 322 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

99 S.W.3d 494 (Marriage of King v. Loss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Matthews
99 S.W.3d 494 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)