Marriage of Femmer v. Femmer

669 S.W.2d 63
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 1984
DocketNo. 47052
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 669 S.W.2d 63 (Marriage of Femmer v. Femmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marriage of Femmer v. Femmer, 669 S.W.2d 63 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

KAROHL, Presiding Judge.

Respondent wife filed a joint motion for civil contempt and motion to modify dissolution decree obtained by appellant-petitioner husband on March 20, 1980. She requested an order of civil contempt to force her former husband to deed to her their family home according to the terms of a property settlement agreement and for increased maintenance and child support. Appellant husband filed a cross-petition for modification requesting custody of two minor children.

By its terms the order here appealed is not a final judgment. § 512.020 RSMo 1978. After the order was entered the trial court overruled appellant husband’s motion to make and enter a final judgment. The cross-motions were heard together. The court ordered a child custody study. Pending completion of the study he entered temporary orders and retained jurisdiction over the question of permanent custody, temporary custody, visitation and child support.

We are obligated to determine if the appeal may lie and we are required “to make such an inquiry sua sponte.” In re Marriage of Richardson, 540 S.W.2d 227, 228 (Mo.App.1976). The right of appeal in Missouri is purely statutory, In re Marriage of Richardson, 540 S.W.2d at 228. Section 512.020 RSMo 1978 permits an appeal only from a final judgment disposing of all parties and all issues. The order here appealed from expressly retains jurisdiction as to some of the issues. There being no final judgment for this court to review the appeal must be dismissed. In re Marriage of Richardson, 540 S.W.2d 227, 228 (Mo.App.1976); Pendleton v. Pendleton, 532 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1976).

REINHARD and CRANDALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baird v. Baird
804 S.W.2d 836 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)
Nenninger ex rel. Kievit v. Nenninger
789 S.W.2d 62 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 S.W.2d 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marriage-of-femmer-v-femmer-moctapp-1984.