Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk

Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk

532 So. 2d 98, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671, 1988 WL 107404
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 1988
DocketNo. 88-460
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 532 So. 2d 98 (Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk, 532 So. 2d 98, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671, 1988 WL 107404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to any issue raised on appeal or cross-appeal with the exception of the husband’s contention that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the wife. The undisputed evidence reveals that the wife received marital property and income substantially equal to the husband, and thus she is in a position to bear the cost of her attorney’s fees. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Dell v. O'Dell
583 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
McKenzie v. Kinsey
532 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 So. 2d 98, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671, 1988 WL 107404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marriage-of-faulk-v-faulk-fladistctapp-1988.