Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk
532 So. 2d 98, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671, 1988 WL 107404
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1988·No. No. 88-460·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no merit to any issue raised on appeal or cross-appeal with the exception of the husband’s contention that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the wife. The undisputed evidence reveals that the wife received marital property and income substantially equal to the husband, and thus she is in a position to bear the cost of her attorney’s fees. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk, 532 So. 2d 98, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671, 1988 WL 107404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
532 So. 2d 98 (Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Dell v. O'Dell
583 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
McKenzie v. Kinsey
532 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)