Marrero v. Whittaker
This text of 110 F. App'x 188 (Marrero v. Whittaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant appeals from a judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to file an amended complaint.
We conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action after plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint in accordance with its June 6, 1998 order. Furthermore, we conclude that, construing the unamended complaint in plaintiffs favor, none of his claims are likely to survive a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
We have considered all of plaintiffs claims on appeal and we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrero-v-whittaker-ca2-2004.