Marrero v. State
803 So. 2d 760, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15271, 2001 WL 1335089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-2137
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 803 So. 2d 760 (Marrero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marrero v. State, 803 So. 2d 760, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15271, 2001 WL 1335089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
ON MOTION TO PASS UPON A QUESTION CERTIFIED TO BE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
We grant the motion. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Motion granted; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Adderly
803 So. 2d 760 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
803 So. 2d 760, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15271, 2001 WL 1335089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrero-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.