Marr v. Bell

1 Tenn. 368
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedDecember 6, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 368 (Marr v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marr v. Bell, 1 Tenn. 368 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not lie in the month of the appellant to take exception to the manner in which his own appeal was brought up, such an exception as this, is similiar to a person taking exception to his own declaration, or other pleading ; a proceeding never known in practice. If the appellee be satisfied without security, for which the bond was intended, *369 the appellant cannot complain, nor make it an exception.—The original bond is sent up, but we cannot give judgment on that. A copy should have made a part of the record sent, and the original should remain in the county court.

The appellee was willing to take judgment against the principal, without the securities, which the court directed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marr-v-bell-tennsuperct-1808.