Marquis v. ABF Freight System, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 21, 2025·No. 3:24-cv-00401·Unknown

Opinion

Justin J. Bustos (State Bar No. 10320) JBustos@dickinsonwright.com 100 West Liberty Street, Suite 940 Reno, Nevada 89501-1991 Telephone: 775-343-7503 Facsimile: 844-670-6009 HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP Emily Burkhardt Vicente (admitted pro hac vice) ebvicente@hunton.com 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-532-2153 Facsimile: 213-532-2020 Theanna Bezney (admitted pro hac vice) tbezney@HuntonAK.com 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-468-3551 Facsimile: 214-880-0011 Counsel for Defendant ABF Freight System, Inc. DISTRICT OF NEVADA JACKIE MARQUIS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00401-ART-CLB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT v. AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Defendant. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and subject to the Court’s approval, this Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation and Order”) is entered into by and between Plaintiff Jackie Marquis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ABF Freight System, Inc. (“Defendant”) to facilitate the production of confidential, proprietary and/or private information during the course of discovery and pretrial proceedings in this action (the “Action”). 1. DEFINITIONS a) Challenging Party. A Party that challenges the designation of Discovery Material as “Confidential” under this Stipulation and Order. b) Confidential Discovery Material. Any Discovery Material (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and Order. c) Designating Party. Any Party or Non-Party who designates information or items for protection pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and Order. d) Discovery Material. Any information provided in the course of discovery in this Action, including, but not limited to, information contained in documents, testimony taken at depositions and transcripts thereof, deposition exhibits, and tangible things. e) Inadvertently Disclosed Information. Information subject to a claim of attorney client privilege, attorney work product protection, or other applicable privilege, that a Producing Party inadvertently discloses to a Receiving Party in this Action. f) Non-Party. Any person or entity that is not a Party to the Action. g) Party. Any named Party to the Action. h) Producing Party. A Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in the Action. i) Receiving Party. A Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party in the Action. j) Exhibit A. The Non-Disclosure Agreement annexed as Exhibit A hereto. 2. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Confidential Discovery Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Confidential Discovery Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Confidential Discovery Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Confidential Discovery Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (i) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (ii) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Confidential Discovery Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 3. DESIGNATING DISCOVERY MATERIAL a) Any Producing Party may designate as “Confidential” Discovery Material that the Party or non-Party believes in good faith consists of: 1. any personal information of a sensitive nature regarding any individual; 2. proprietary information; 3. personnel-related information; 4. sensitive business information; 5. information constituting or relating to trade secrets; 6. personal and business financial information; 7. financial information not otherwise available or disclosed to the public; 8. business plans and strategies, formulation, or research information, marketing plans, commercial information or trade secrets not otherwise available or disclosed to the public; 9. projections or analyses; 10. studies or analyses by internal or outside experts, attorneys or consultants; 11. competitive analyses; 12. organizational development and planning; 13. marketing plans and strategies; 14. pricing of goods and services; 15. financial, tax, or accounting information; 16. any information entitled to confidential treatment under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other applicable laws or regulations, including information that is subject to U.S. or foreign privacy, data protection or secrecy laws; 17. any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the Court; or 18. medical information/evidence and/or information which falls within the parameters of FRE 412. b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Stipulation and Order is intended to concede that any of the categories listed above are relevant or discoverable and nothing herein shall prejudice in any way any Party’s or non-Party’s objection to, or position concerning, production of the foregoing types of information. c) Each Designating Party will engage in reasonable effort to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under this Stipulation and Order and the appropriate legal standards. To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party will designate for protection only those parts of Discovery Material, that qualify for such protection. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. d) With respect to the “Confidential” portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Designating Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion of the Discovery Material in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. e) With respect to deposition transcripts and exhibits, a Designating Party or its counsel may indicate on the record at the deposition or within 30 days of receipt of the final deposition transcript that the transcript, or a portion thereof, contains “Confidential” information. Transcripts containing “Confidential” testimony shall have a conspicuous legend printed on the title page indicating that the transcript contains “Confidential Information” and on each subsequent page that contains information designed as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and Order. Any designation of confidentiality of deposition and/or deposition exhibits, is subject to the other provisions of this Agreement and Order. f) If prior to the trial in this Action, a Designating Party realizes that some portion(s) of Discovery Material that the Party previously produced without limitation should be designated as “Confidential,” it may so designate the Discovery Material by apprising the other Party in writing, and such designated portion(s) of Discovery Material will thereafter be treated as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and Order. Inadvertent failure to designate Discovery Material as “Confidential” will not waive confidentiality, but the Receiving Party retains the right to challenge s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marquis v. ABF Freight System, Inc., (D. Nev. 2025).

Marquis v. ABF Freight System, Inc. (Marquis v. ABF Freight System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)