Marquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marquez v. State

783 So. 2d 1105, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2920, 2001 WL 228031

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Hector Marquez’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 without prejudice to any right that Marquez might have to file a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en. banc), challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea.

PARKER, A.C.J., and FULMER and SALCINES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Hector Marquez’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 without prejudice to any right that Marquez might have to file a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en. banc), challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea.

PARKER, A.C.J., and FULMER and SALCINES, JJ., concur.

Marquez v. State, 783 So. 2d 1105, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2920, 2001 WL 228031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

783 So. 2d 1105 (Marquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related