Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

559 So. 2d 220, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 209, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 509, 1990 WL 43612
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 12, 1990·No. No. 73560·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We accepted review of Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 534 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), because the decision was certified to be in conflict with Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Smith, 527 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We subsequently issued an opinion quashing the district court’s opinion in Shelby. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith, 556 So.2d 393 (Fla.1990). The decision below is consistent with our recent opinion in Shelby, and there is no longer conflict. We therefore discharge the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 559 So. 2d 220, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 209, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 509, 1990 WL 43612 (Fla. 1990).

559 So. 2d 220 (Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Morrison
574 So. 2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)