Marquez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Marquez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

671 F. App'x 139

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 2016

DocketNo. 16-1527

StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 139 (Marquez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marquez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 671 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christina Marquez appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to uphold the Commissioner’s denial of Marquez’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marquez v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:14-cv-02139-BHH (D.S.C. May 5 & [140]*140Sept. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christina Marquez appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to uphold the Commissioner’s denial of Marquez’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marquez v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:14-cv-02139-BHH (D.S.C. May 5 & [140]*140Sept. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 F. App'x 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquez-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-ca4-2016.