Marquez (Eduardo) v. State
This text of Marquez (Eduardo) v. State (Marquez (Eduardo) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
EDUARDO MARQUEZ, No. 73482 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. SEP 2 5 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLEFtK F UPREME COURT ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from an amended judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that appellant is not aggrieved by the amended judgment of conviction. See NRS 177.015 (only an aggrieved party may appeal). To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 26(c). "[Ain untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
ISOr Alta sew() Parraguirre Stiglich
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
10) 1947A 4ga#17 17- 3235‘t cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Eduardo Marquez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) 1947T se° 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marquez (Eduardo) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquez-eduardo-v-state-nev-2017.