Marquez, Edgar Ortiz

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
DocketWR-78,309-01
StatusPublished

This text of Marquez, Edgar Ortiz (Marquez, Edgar Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marquez, Edgar Ortiz, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-78,309-01
EX PARTE EDGAR ORTIZ MARQUEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-37,115 IN THE 161ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to advise him of the deportation consequences of his guilty plea. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. ___ (2010). The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we set aside Applicant's conviction. We believe that the record should be further developed. Accordingly, the trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

After reviewing counsel's response, the trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether his deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: September 19, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marquez, Edgar Ortiz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquez-edgar-ortiz-texcrimapp-2012.