Marquez A. Miller v. Washington

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 1998
Docket98-2586
StatusUnpublished

This text of Marquez A. Miller v. Washington (Marquez A. Miller v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marquez A. Miller v. Washington, (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 98-2586 ___________

Marquez A. Miller, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Henrietta Washington; Mac Kennedy; * Eastern District of Arkansas. D. Thomas; James Byers; Shirley * Jordan; Larry D. Jordan; Carlos * [UNPUBLISHED] Vowell; Albert Harris; Clifford Terry, * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: November 4 1998 Filed: December 4, 1998 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Marquez A. Miller appeals following the district court’s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion seeking relief from the court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice for failing to exhaust administrative remedies, and the court’s additional denial of his Federal Rule

1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. of Civil Procedure 62(b) motion seeking to stay that judgment. Miller did not timely appeal the underlying judgment so we review only the district court’s ruling on the post-judgment motions. See Fed R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 168 (8th Cir. 1988). After a careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant the motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) (in its discretion court may stay the execution of judgment); Baxter Int’l, Inc., v. Morris, 11 F.3d 90, 92 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review for denial of Rule 60(b) motion).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marquez A. Miller v. Washington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquez-a-miller-v-washington-ca8-1998.