Marquardt v. State

52 Ark. 269
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Indictment : Time. The allegation of time in the indictment is immaterial; the gist of the offence is that spirituous liquor was sold on Sunday, and whether the day of the month is correctly stated is no more important in this than in other cases. Whart. Crim. Pl. and Pr., sec. 121; People v. Ball, 42 Barb., 324; State v. Drake, 64 N. C., 591; State v. Eskridge, 1 Swan, 416.

In Robinson v. State, 38 Ark., 548, it was not charged that the offence was committed on Sunday but only on a day of the month which the court judicially knew was not Sunday. That case does not conflict with the view now expressed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marquardt v. State, 52 Ark. 269 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 269 (Marquardt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Venable v. State
5 S.W.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)