Marquadt v. Sieberling
23 N.E. 149, 121 Ind. 307, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 64
This text of 23 N.E. 149 (Marquadt v. Sieberling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marquadt v. Sieberling, 23 N.E. 149, 121 Ind. 307, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 64 (Ind. 1889).
Opinion
— The evidence, as the appellee contends, is not properly in the record, and the instructions certainly are not. Instructions can not be brought before this court by the mere report of the stenographer where it does not appear that they were ever signed by the judge or filed by the proper officer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 N.E. 149, 121 Ind. 307, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquadt-v-sieberling-ind-1889.