Marqua v. Martin

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marqua v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Ohio St. 56
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1923·No. No. 17844·Published

Opinion

MATTHIAS,. J.

1. The owner of a building, out of possession and control, is not liable to persons upon the premises by invitation of the lessee thereof for injuries resulting from the physical condition of such premises, unless such liability is imposed by contract or statute.

2. Although there is a presumption, where a statute has undergone revision and consolidation by codification, that the construction thereof will be the same as prior thereto, yet, where the language of the revised statute is plain and unambiguous, it must be given the meaning and effect required by the plain and ordinary significance of the words used whatever may have been the language of the prior statute.

3. The scope and effect of the provisions of Section 12578, General Code, so far as they apply to one who constructs a building such as therein described, are limited by the requirements prescribed by the fourteen sections of the General Code next succeeding said Section 12578, General Code.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marqua v. Martin, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862 (Ohio 1923).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862 (Marqua v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.