Marpret Construction Corp. v. Hargust Land Corp.

214 A.D. 792
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think the court had no power to cancel a Us pendens except as provided by section 123 of the Civil Practice Act, or where the complaint itself fails to state a cause of action affecting real property. Where a complaint states such a cause of action the lis pendens cannot be canceled upon proof outside of the complaint that plaintiff has no such cause of action. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marpret Construction Corp. v. Hargust Land Corp., 214 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

214 A.D. 792 (Marpret Construction Corp. v. Hargust Land Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Sabatino
90 Misc. 2d 56 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1977)
Schlegel v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n
38 Misc. 2d 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Sunshine v. Ainspan
39 Misc. 2d 292 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Billson Housing Corp. v. Harrison
26 Misc. 2d 675 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Schlaifer v. Shelby-Coleridge, Inc.
206 Misc. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Richards v. Chuba
195 Misc. 732 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Klunder v. Hansen
190 Misc. 294 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Hurdman v. Kelly
167 Misc. 945 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)