Marple v. Banister

151 S.W. 921, 151 Ky. 372, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 806
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 20, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.W. 921 (Marple v. Banister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marple v. Banister, 151 S.W. 921, 151 Ky. 372, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 806 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion op- the Court by

Judge Turner

Affirming.

In the case of Violet v. Purdy, &c., in an opinion this day rendered by Judge Nunn the precise question involved in this appeal is determined. The two appeals are from the same court, and the deed construed in that opinion is a companion one to the deed involved herein, having been made by the same grantor, at the same time, and in each case made by him to his grandchildren. For the reasons given therein the appellee, Banister, took a defeasible fee under the deed from his grandfather, which upon the death of the grandfather ripened into a fee simple; and, therefore, he had a good title to the land involved and appellant should be required to accept the- deed tendered therefor.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 S.W. 921, 151 Ky. 372, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marple-v-banister-kyctapp-1912.