Marotto v. McCotter

85 N.Y.S. 1138
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 17, 1903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff lost all his rights and claims under the lease- by failing to pay the rent reserved in it, and suffering himself to be dispossessed for the nonpayment thereof. The defendant was in no way responsible for the acts of the new landlord, and the lower court was extremely liberal in allowing evidence of them. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marotto v. McCotter, 85 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

85 N.Y.S. 1138 (Marotto v. McCotter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.