Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
676 A.2d 1064, 144 N.J. 325, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 782
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J.Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n, 676 A.2d 1064, 144 N.J. 325, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 782 (N.J. 1996).
676 A.2d 1064 (Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas Demarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.m(073949)
125 A.3d 367 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2015)
Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. Perez
121 A.3d 374 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2015)
Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co. v. LaCroix
915 A.2d 89 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Proformance Insurance v. Jones
887 A.2d 146 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)
Marotta v. NJ AUTO. INS. UNDERWRITING ASSOC.
676 A.2d 1064 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS
676 A.2d 1065 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)