Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Marot v. Bassett

Marot v. Bassett

122 A. 303, 95 N.J. Eq. 262, 10 Stock. 262, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 714
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 28, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 122 A. 303 (Marot v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marot v. Bassett, 122 A. 303, 95 N.J. Eq. 262, 10 Stock. 262, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 714 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the court of chancery should be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Learning as above.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Mintubn, Kaliscii, Black, Katzenbacpi, White, Heppenheimer, Van Buskirk—11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A. 303, 95 N.J. Eq. 262, 10 Stock. 262, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marot-v-bassett-nj-1923.