Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Marot v. Bassett

Marot v. Bassett

122 A. 303, 95 N.J. Eq. 262, 10 Stock. 262, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 714
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 28, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the court of chancery should be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Learning as above.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Mintubn, Kaliscii, Black, Katzenbacpi, White, Heppenheimer, Van Buskirk—11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marot v. Bassett, 122 A. 303, 95 N.J. Eq. 262, 10 Stock. 262, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 714 (N.J. 1923).

122 A. 303 (Marot v. Bassett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.