Maronski v. Maronski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maronski v. Maronski

127 A.D.2d 635, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 635 (Maronski v. Maronski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maronski v. Maronski, 127 A.D.2d 635, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 16, 1982, the defendant wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 11, 1986, which granted the motion of the plaintiff husband for temporary custody of the parties’ children pending a hearing and determination on his application to modify the judgment of divorce, inter alia, to transfer custody of the parties’ two children to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Saladino, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an expedited hearing.

An expedited hearing should be held in this matter so that all issues may be finally resolved. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 16, 1982, the defendant wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 11, 1986, which granted the motion of the plaintiff husband for temporary custody of the parties’ children pending a hearing and determination on his application to modify the judgment of divorce, inter alia, to transfer custody of the parties’ two children to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Saladino, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an expedited hearing.

An expedited hearing should be held in this matter so that all issues may be finally resolved. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 635, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maronski-v-maronski-nyappdiv-1987.