Maroney v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.

106 Mass. 153
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 106 Mass. 153 (Maroney v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maroney v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co., 106 Mass. 153 (Mass. 1870).

Opinion

Wells, J.

The plaintiff’s ticket entitled him to a passage npon any regular train for passengers upon the road of the defendants. It contained no notice of any restriction or limitation of the right which it purported to give. It was issued by the ticket agent of the Cape Cod Railroad Company, whose authority for that purpose was sufficiently shown by the fact that such tickets had been so issued by said company “ for some months prior” thereto, “with the assent uf the defendants.” The defendants could not, by any rule or regulation not previously made known, restrict the plaintiff from taking the passage to which his ticket entitled him, in any regular train for the accommodation of passengers. Under the instructions, the jury must have found that there was no such information to the plaintiff personally; and the case shows no such publication of the rule as would affect him with notice thereof.

The evidence of the inquiry made by the plaintiff of the person from whom he purchased his ticket, “if he could go to Newport on the morning train on that ticket,” and the answer that he could do so, was restricted explicitly by the j'udge at the trial, to me question whether the plaintiff had previous knowledge of the rule in question.

We think that the defendants show no good ground of exception to the ruling or the instructions to the jury in the court below. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeBoard v. Camden Interstate Railway Co.
57 S.E. 279 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1907)
Kiley v. Chicago City Ry. Co.
90 Ill. App. 275 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Nicholai
30 N.E. 424 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hamel v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.
1 Silv. Sup. 584 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Hufford v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad
31 N.W. 544 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Murdock v. Boston & Albany Railroad
137 Mass. 293 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)
Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.
15 F. 57 (W.D. Tennessee, 1882)
McMahon v. Third Avenue Railroad
15 Jones & S. 282 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1881)
Jerome v. Smith
48 Vt. 230 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Mass. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maroney-v-old-colony-newport-railway-co-mass-1870.