Maronek ex rel. Atlantis Operating Co. v. Atlantis Hotel, Inc.
148 So. 2d 721
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1963·No. No. 61-766·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff in the trial court appeals a final decree for defendant after trial. The only rights which the appellant attempts to assert are those of the Atlantis Operating Co., Inc., in which he is a minority stockholder. In a suit of this nature, one essential allegation of the complaint must be the act whereby the corporation was caused to suffer damage. Talcott v. McDowell, Fla.App.1962, 148 So.2d 36. The chancellor correctly concluded that no such damage was proved.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maronek ex rel. Atlantis Operating Co. v. Atlantis Hotel, Inc., 148 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).
148 So. 2d 721 (Maronek ex rel. Atlantis Operating Co. v. Atlantis Hotel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C.A.T. LLC. v. Island Developers, Ltd.
827 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jacob Schein and Marvin H. Schein v. Melvin Chasen, Antone F. Gregorio v. Lum's, Inc.
519 F.2d 453 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Schein v. Chasen
313 So. 2d 739 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Palma v. Zerbey
189 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Blackwelder v. D'Ercole Enterprises, Inc.
148 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)