Marone v. Kally
This text of 139 A.D.3d 915 (Marone v. Kally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an ac *916 tion, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property, the defendants Charles M. Rally and Mimi M. Rally appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), dated August 25, 2014, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to reform the subject deeds to reflect the metes and bounds description contained in the first cause of action of the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendants Charles M. Rally and Mimi M. Rally (hereinafter together the defendants) contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to reform the deeds pertaining to the parcels of real property at issue in this action to reflect the metes and bounds description contained in the first cause of action of the complaint. The defendants argue that such relief was precluded by this Court’s determination on a prior appeal in this matter (see Marone v Kally, 109 AD3d 880 [2013]). The defendants’ contention is without merit.
The defendants’ remaining contention is not properly before this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 A.D.3d 915, 30 N.Y.S.3d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marone-v-kally-nyappdiv-2016.