Marone v. Kally

139 A.D.3d 915, 30 N.Y.S.3d 569
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2016·No. 2015-07279·Published

Opinion

In an ac *916 tion, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property, the defendants Charles M. Rally and Mimi M. Rally appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), dated August 25, 2014, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to reform the subject deeds to reflect the metes and bounds description contained in the first cause of action of the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants Charles M. Rally and Mimi M. Rally (hereinafter together the defendants) contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to reform the deeds pertaining to the parcels of real property at issue in this action to reflect the metes and bounds description contained in the first cause of action of the complaint. The defendants argue that such relief was precluded by this Court’s determination on a prior appeal in this matter (see Marone v Kally, 109 AD3d 880 [2013]). The defendants’ contention is without merit.

The defendants’ remaining contention is not properly before this Court.

Hall, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marone v. Kally, 139 A.D.3d 915, 30 N.Y.S.3d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 915 (Marone v. Kally) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marone v. Kally
109 A.D.3d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)