Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath

Appellate Court of Illinois

Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath

205 Ill. App. 605

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 29, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,652

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 Ill. App. 605 (Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath, 205 Ill. App. 605 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when provision in policy restricting use of automobile applies to both mortgagor amé mortgagee. The condition in a policy of fire insurance issued on an automobile to the mortgagee and mortgagor of the car, as their respective interests might appear, that the car shall not be used for renting purposes or for hire, applies to both the mortgagor and the mortgagee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when provision in policy restricting use of automobile applies to both mortgagor amé mortgagee. The condition in a policy of fire insurance issued on an automobile to the mortgagee and mortgagor of the car, as their respective interests might appear, that the car shall not be used for renting purposes or for hire, applies to both the mortgagor and the mortgagee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 Ill. App. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marmon-chicago-co-v-heath-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack