Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath

Appellate Court of Illinois

Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath

205 Ill. App. 605

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 29, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,652·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when provision in policy restricting use of automobile applies to both mortgagor amé mortgagee. The condition in a policy of fire insurance issued on an automobile to the mortgagee and mortgagor of the car, as their respective interests might appear, that the car shall not be used for renting purposes or for hire, applies to both the mortgagor and the mortgagee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when provision in policy restricting use of automobile applies to both mortgagor amé mortgagee. The condition in a policy of fire insurance issued on an automobile to the mortgagee and mortgagor of the car, as their respective interests might appear, that the car shall not be used for renting purposes or for hire, applies to both the mortgagor and the mortgagee.

Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath, 205 Ill. App. 605 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

205 Ill. App. 605 (Marmon Chicago Co. v. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related