Marmolejo-Campos v. Mukasey
This text of Marmolejo-Campos v. Mukasey (Marmolejo-Campos v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMANDO MARMOLEJO-CAMPOS, aka Campos Ramos Armando, No. 04-76644 Petitioner, v. Agency No. A71-616-204 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent. Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2591 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marmolejo-Campos v. Mukasey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marmolejo-campos-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.