Marmaduke v. Brown
98 A. 769, 254 Pa. 18, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 676
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1916·No. Appeals, Nos. 172 and 170·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The bill of the complainant was for an accounting, and both she and the defendants are dissatisfied with the decree made. The court below committed no error in refusing to charge the defendants with the value of the good will of the business, and what it has decreed they [25] shall pay is, under all the evidence, what they legally owe.
Each appeal is dismissed at appellants’ costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marmaduke v. Brown, 98 A. 769, 254 Pa. 18, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 676 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 769 (Marmaduke v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quaid v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board
149 A.2d 557 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
O'DONNELL v. McLoughlin
125 A.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
O'Brien v. O'Brien
172 S.W.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1942)
Underdown v. Underdown
124 A. 159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Brown v. Kaplan
3 Pa. D. & C. 751 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)