Marlyn Realty Co. v. Town of West Orange
This text of 136 A. 926 (Marlyn Realty Co. v. Town of West Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a zoning ordinance case. Eelator asks a mandamus for a permit to build in disregard of the limitations imposed by the ordinance.
It appears that the town of West Orange has a board of adjustment, as contemplated by Pamph. L. 1926, p. 526, and that relator did not appeal to that board.
Following the decision in Chancellor Development Corp. v. Senior, 134 Atl. Rep. 337; 4 N. J. Mis. R. 633, mandamus at this stage will be refused and the rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.
Other similar cases are Letz & Katz v. Ackerman, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 169; Burg v. Ackerman, Id. 96; Bilt-Wel Co. v. Crange, Id. 180; Paramount Realty Co. v. Schmitt, Id. 177.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 A. 926, 5 N.J. Misc. 342, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlyn-realty-co-v-town-of-west-orange-nj-1927.