Marlow v. State

545 So. 2d 940, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1374, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3138, 1989 WL 58708
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1989·No. No. 88-3274·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

POLEN, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a conviction and sentence under section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1987). Appellant unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of this statute in the trial court as being viola-tive of the “one-subject rule.”

This court specifically found that the challenged statute was constitutional in State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th [941]*941DCA 1989). We further have certified the question to the supreme court.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court on authority of Burch. Issuance of the mandate is stayed pending disposition of the certified question by the supreme court.

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marlow v. State, 545 So. 2d 940, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1374, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3138, 1989 WL 58708 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

545 So. 2d 940 (Marlow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marlow v. State
565 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Speights v. State
554 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)