Marlow v. Marlow
This text of 31 S.E. 146 (Marlow v. Marlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a controversy between a father ■and his parents over the custody of a minor child of the former. He sued out a writ of habeas corpus to obtain from his father :and mother the possession of the child. The case was heard by the .ordinary, by whom the writ was issued, and he awarded the child to the petitioner. On certiorari the ordinary’s judgment was affirmed, and the grandparents excepted. No question of law is presented. The evidence was conflicting as to whether or not the father had relinquished to his parents his parental right to and control over the child’s person. There was no evidence showing that he was in any respect an unfit or improper person to have the custody and control of his child. There is nothing, therefore, for us to do but to affirm the judgment. The case of Franklin v. Carswell, 103 Ga. 553, is controlling.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 S.E. 146, 105 Ga. 178, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlow-v-marlow-ga-1898.