Marlon Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director

672 F. App'x 449
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 2016
Docket14-20543
StatusUnpublished

This text of 672 F. App'x 449 (Marlon Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marlon Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director, 672 F. App'x 449 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee Lorie Davis’s unopposed motion to cancel oral argument is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ap-pellee Lorie Davis’s unopposed motion to waive the exhaustion requirement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3) with respect to those claims that were raised in Appellant Marlon Dantruce Williams’s state ha-beas application is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s judgment is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court to review Appellant Marlon Dantruce Williams’s federal habeas application on the merits with respect to those claims that were raised in Appellant’s state habeas application. This is a full remand. We place no limit on the matters that the district court may address, as needed, and we express no view on what rulings that court should make.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the' limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlon-williams-v-lorie-davis-director-ca5-2016.