Marlon Johnson a/k/a Marvin v. State of Mississippi

• Court: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
• Decided: May 7, 2024
• Docket: 2022-KA-01127-COA
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 2022-KA-01127-COA

MARLON JOHNSON A/K/A MARVIN APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/18/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALBERT B. SMITH III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER BY: W. DANIEL HINCHCLIFF ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ABBIE EASON KOONCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY: BRENDA FAY MITCHELL NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 05/07/2024 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

BEFORE WILSON, P.J., McCARTY AND EMFINGER, JJ.

EMFINGER, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶1. On May 17, 2022, a Coahoma County Circuit Court jury found Marlon Johnson guilty

of sexual battery pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-95(1)(d) (Rev. 2020).

The circuit court sentenced Johnson to serve twenty years in the custody of the Mississippi

Department of Corrections. After the court denied his motion for judgment of acquittal

notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial, Johnson appealed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2. According to the victim, K.H., on the evening of November 29, 2014, she and her friend K.J. went out to eat.1 At the time of the incident, K.H. and K.J. were thirteen and

fourteen years old, respectively. After they finished eating, the girls were supposed to call

their parents for a ride to the bowling alley. They never called either of their parents because

Johnson, Deontae Strong, and Demetris Thompson arrived and offered them a ride to the

bowling alley, and the girls accepted. One of the young men told the girls that they “had to

go home and get something.” According to K.H.’s testimony, when they arrived at a trailer

park in Oakhurst, the men asked them to get out, and the girls went into the trailer. K.H.

testified that she and K.J. sat on the sofa when they first entered the trailer. K.H. observed

Johnson’s high school diploma, and that is how she knew Johnson “stayed there.” At some

point, K.J. and Thompson went into a room in the back of the trailer.

¶3. K.H. went into a bedroom with Strong and Johnson. K.H. testified that Strong turned

off the lights and closed the door. According to K.H., Strong restrained her while Johnson

pulled off her pants. She struggled with them at first, but Strong hit her, her nose ring came

out, and her nose started bleeding. She stopped fighting as a result. Strong sexually assaulted

her first and walked out of the room. Then Johnson also sexually assaulted her by putting his

penis into her vagina.

¶4. K.H. explained that after the assault, she found her clothes, left the room, and found

K.J. in the hallway. The two girls then went outside. K.H. was about to tell K.J. what

happened when K.J. told her, “[H]old on, because he’s about to come out here,” talking about

Thompson. Eventually Strong, Johnson, and Thompson all came out of the trailer. The three

1 We use initials to protect the minors’ privacy.

2 men and the two girls got into the vehicle and drove away from the trailer. As they drove,

K.H. testified that she was telling K.J., “[W]e’ve got to get out of here. Something ‘fin to

happen.” K.H.’s testimony shows the girls were frightened at this point and wanted to exit

the vehicle. Eventually, the driver stopped the vehicle, and the girls got out and “took off

running” in different directions. When K.H. looked back and did not see K.J., she went back

to get her. At that point, the girls encountered Officer Eddie Earl, a patrol officer with the

Clarksdale Police Department.

¶5. Earl was patrolling the Oakhurst area when he spotted the girls and attempted to make

contact with them. The girls initially ran from Earl, but he was able to make contact and get

them to identify themselves. According to Earl’s testimony, it was past curfew, and he could

tell the girls were juveniles based on their appearance. Earl testified that he told both girls

to get into his patrol car, and he took them to the police department, where their parents were

called. K.H. and K.J. were later released to their mothers.

¶6. K.H.’s sister testified that after her mother and K.H. arrived home, she could tell

something was wrong, and she took K.H. to the bathroom in the back of the house and asked

K.H. to tell her what was wrong. After K.H. explained to her what had happened, they went

to their mother and father, who, according to K.H.’s sister, “handled the situation after that.”

They took K.H. to the Northwest Regional Medical Center and the police station that night.

¶7. At the hospital, K.H. was seen by sexual-assault nurse examiner, Jacqueline Williams,

and K.H. indicated to her that she had been sexually assaulted. Williams performed a

physical examination of K.H. and prepared a sexual assault kit.

3 ¶8. Detective Jamie Stribling, an investigator for the Clarksdale Police Department, was

called to the hospital to investigate the reported sexual assault. After arriving at the hospital,

he spoke with K.H.’s mother but did not speak with K.H. because she was a juvenile.

According to protocol, Stribling arranged for a trained forensic interviewer to speak with

K.H. Stribling later went back to the hospital to retrieve the sexual assault kit, which was

then taken to the Mississippi Crime Laboratory in Batesville. Stribling also obtained DNA

samples from Strong and Johnson to compare with any DNA found in the rape kit.

¶9. Steven Little, who was qualified as an expert in the field of forensic serology,

analyzed the rape kit at the crime lab. Little testified that his role was to identify any DNA

samples on the items collected in the rape kit and preserve them for DNA testing. Alexandria

Bradley was qualified as an expert in the field of forensic DNA analysis for the State. She

tested DNA swabs from both Strong and Johnson. Bradley testified that the DNA she tested

from the rape-kit items was a match to Johnson. Strong was excluded as a contributor to the

samples tested.

¶10. After K.H.’s testimony, the State rested its case. Johnson moved for a directed verdict,

which the court denied. Johnson elected not to testify, and the defense rested without calling

any witnesses. The jury was instructed and retired to deliberate, ultimately finding Johnson

guilty of sexual battery. After the court denied Johnson’s post-trial motion, he appealed.

ANALYSIS

¶11. Johnson’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Lindsey v. State, 939 So. 2d 743

4 (Miss. 2005),2 representing to this Court that “counsel diligently searched the procedural and

factual history of this criminal action and scoured the record searching for any arguable

issues which could be presented to the Court on Marlon Johnson’s behalf in good faith for

appellate review, and upon conclusion, have found none.” Counsel requested Johnson be

granted an additional forty days within which to file a pro se brief. By our order dated

October 4, 2023, this Court granted Johnson an additional forty days to file a pro se

supplemental brief; however, no supplemental brief was filed.

¶12. We have conducted an independent and thorough review of the record in this case. We

find there is legally sufficient evidence to support Johnson’s conviction. Further, we find no

issues that warrant reversal of Johnson’s conviction or sentence. See Jackson v. State, 335

So. 3d 620, 623 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2022).

¶13. AFFIRMED.

BARNES, C.J., CARLTON AND WILSON, P.JJ., GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS, McDONALD, LAWRENCE, McCARTY AND SMITH, JJ., CONCUR.

2 In Powe v. State, 366 So. 3d 944, 945 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2023), we explained:

Lindsey establishes the “procedure to govern cases where appellate counsel represents an indigent criminal defendant and does not believe his or her client’s case presents any arguable issues on appeal[.]” Lindsey, 939 So. 2d at 748 (¶18).