Marlo Edmundo Mujica v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 2014·No. 04-13-00807-CR·Published

Opinion

The

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2014

No. 04-13-00807-CR

Marlo Edmundo MUJICA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR2756 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a motion asking this court to recalculate the due date for appellant’s brief. In the motion, appellant contends the reporter’s record is incomplete because it does not include State’s exhibit 2. After reviewing the record, we agree. We find State’s exhibit 2 was admitted into evidence. The trial court stated on the record that it was going to allow the jury to hear twenty minutes of the exhibit, a CD recording, and that the jury could listen to the rest if it so desired. Accordingly, although the trial court did not specifically stated the exhibit was “admitted,” into evidence, we find that it was implicitly admitted. Therefore, we ORDER the court reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing State’s exhibit 2 with this court on or before June 27, 2014. We GRANT appellant’s motion and order appellant to file the appellant’s brief twenty-one days from the date the supplemental reporter’s record is filed.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marlo Edmundo Mujica v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Marlo Edmundo Mujica v. State (Marlo Edmundo Mujica v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.