Marlito Biala v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2014·No. 10-71927·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 25 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARLITO NAVARRO BIALA, No. 10-71927

Petitioner, Agency No. A038-557-238

v. MEMORANDUM* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued April 10, 2014 Submitted July 23, 2014 San Francisco, California

Before: NOONAN, NGUYEN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

We grant the petition and remand it so the Board of Immigration Appeals

can apply the framework established in In re M-A-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (B.I.A.

2011). See Pannu v. Holder, 639 F.3d 1225, 1229 (9th Cir. 2011).

We do not reach Biala’s other claims of error.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marlito Biala v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2014).

Marlito Biala v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Marlito Biala v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pannu v. Holder
639 F.3d 1225 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
M-A-M
25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2011)