MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT
This text of MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT (MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARLINE AMIACHE, Appellant,
v.
MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI, GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT, Appellees.
No. 4D20-1897
[December 30, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CA- 003957-XXXX-MB.
E. Cole FitzGerald, III of E. Cole FitzGerald, III PLLC, Palm Beach, for appellant.
Selina P. Patel and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marline-amiache-v-marlene-blick-paula-curmi-george-debonis-and-harold-fladistctapp-2021.