Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT

MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2021·No. 20-1897·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

MARLINE AMIACHE, Appellant,

v.

MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI, GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT, Appellees.

No. 4D20-1897

[December 30, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CA- 003957-XXXX-MB.

E. Cole FitzGerald, III of E. Cole FitzGerald, III PLLC, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Selina P. Patel and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT (MARLINE AMIACHE v. MARLENE BLICK, PAULA CURMI. GEORGE DEBONIS, and HAROLD SCHMIDT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.