Marley v. Cavness
This text of 75 P.2d 700 (Marley v. Cavness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is ruled by tbe decision, McCall v. Cull, ante, p. 237, 75 Pac. (2d) 696.
Defendant, Cavness, was appointed a member of tbe livestock sanitary board on January 5, 1933, and before tbe expiration of bis tbree-year term on, to wit, March 5, 1935, tbe Governor reappointed him with tbe advice and consent of tbe Senate, but tbis last appointment was void for tbe reason that there was no vacancy when it was made.
Defendant served bis term under tbe original appointment and, because no successor was appointed *248 and qualified, continued liis tenure in the office under section 56, Revised Code of 1928, and was the lawful incumbent thereof on August 14, 1937, when plaintiff was appointed to the office by the Governor.
Because there was no vacancy in the office, the Governor could not appoint plaintiff. The power to do so being conferred upon him and the Senate jointly, their concurrence was necessary to the appointment.
The demurrer is sustained and the judgment is that the complaint be dismissed.
McALISTER, C. J., and LOCKWOOD, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 P.2d 700, 51 Ariz. 247, 1938 Ariz. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marley-v-cavness-ariz-1938.