Marley Roof Tiles v. Smarr

672 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4374, 1996 WL 200220
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1714
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 So. 2d 633 (Marley Roof Tiles v. Smarr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marley Roof Tiles v. Smarr, 672 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4374, 1996 WL 200220 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case there was an undue delay between the final hearing and entry of the appealed order. Because it cannot be ascertained from the order whether the judge could clearly recall all pertinent aspects of the hearing, and the credibility and testimony of live witnesses was of critical importance, the appealed order is reversed and the case remanded for a de novo hearing. See, e.g., Harrington v. Vida Appliance Corp., 542 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

ZEHMER, C.J., and ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Ross
911 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4374, 1996 WL 200220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marley-roof-tiles-v-smarr-fladistctapp-1996.