Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
31 A.3d 656
This text of 31 A.3d 656 (Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 31 A.3d 656 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err (as identified in the dissenting opinion) in holding, in conflict with Allen v. M[e]llinger, that plaintiffs may recover delay damages based on the full amount of the jury verdict rather than on the legally recoverable molded verdict, which was reduced to reflect the insurance policy limits that plaintiffs were permitted to receive?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 A.3d 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlette-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-pa-2011.