Marler v. Martin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Marler v. Martin

919 N.W.2d 191

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 6, 2018

DocketNo. 20180019

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 919 N.W.2d 191 (Marler v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marler v. Martin, 919 N.W.2d 191 (N.D. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kevin Martin appeals from a judgment entered after a jury awarded Brian Marler $10,400 in damages for breach of contract and from an order denying Martin's motion for a new trial. On appeal, Martin raises thirteen separate issues for this Court to address. This Court is limited to a review of the issues Martin raised in his motion for a new trial. See Prairie Supply, Inc. v. Apple Elec., Inc. , 2015 ND 190, ¶ 7, 867 N.W.2d 335. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kevin Martin appeals from a judgment entered after a jury awarded Brian Marler $10,400 in damages for breach of contract and from an order denying Martin's motion for a new trial. On appeal, Martin raises thirteen separate issues for this Court to address. This Court is limited to a review of the issues Martin raised in his motion for a new trial. See Prairie Supply, Inc. v. Apple Elec., Inc. , 2015 ND 190, ¶ 7, 867 N.W.2d 335. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

919 N.W.2d 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marler-v-martin-nd-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack