Marler v. Martin

919 N.W.2d 191
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 2018·No. No. 20180019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kevin Martin appeals from a judgment entered after a jury awarded Brian Marler $10,400 in damages for breach of contract and from an order denying Martin's motion for a new trial. On appeal, Martin raises thirteen separate issues for this Court to address. This Court is limited to a review of the issues Martin raised in his motion for a new trial. See Prairie Supply, Inc. v. Apple Elec., Inc. , 2015 ND 190, ¶ 7, 867 N.W.2d 335. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marler v. Martin, 919 N.W.2d 191 (N.D. 2018).

919 N.W.2d 191 (Marler v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

UMB Bank N.A. v. Eagle Crest Apartments
2023 ND 4 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2023)