Marlene June v. United States

550 F. App'x 505
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2013·No. 11-17776·Unpublished·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*506 MEMORANDUM ***

Plaintiff Marlene June, acting as conservator for A.K.B., (“June”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse and remand. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here.

After the district court entered judgment, an en banc panel of this Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act is not jurisdictional and that equitable adjustment of the limitations period in that section is not prohibited. Wong v. Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc), overruling Marley v. United States, 567 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2009). In light of Wong, we must reverse the district court’s contrary ruling and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

We need not, and do not, reach any other issue urged by the parties on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marlene June v. United States, 550 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2013).

550 F. App'x 505 (Marlene June v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony Booth v. United States
914 F.3d 1199 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Kwai Fun Wong
575 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. Kwai Fun Wong. United States
575 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. June
134 S. Ct. 2873 (Supreme Court, 2014)