Marlene J. Sarres and Gerson Sosa v. Michael C. Howard and Chris Diferrante
This text of Marlene J. Sarres and Gerson Sosa v. Michael C. Howard and Chris Diferrante (Marlene J. Sarres and Gerson Sosa v. Michael C. Howard and Chris Diferrante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 20, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00984-CV ——————————— MARLENE J. SARRES AND GERSON SOSA, Appellants V. MICHAEL C. HOWARD AND CHRIS DIFERRANTE, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1238172
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants Marlene J. Sarres and Gerson Sosa have appealed from a final
judgment awarding possession of certain property to appellees Michael C. Howard
and Chris DiFerrante and awarding attorney’s fees. Appellees filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that appellants have not paid the filing fee, failed to file a complete
appellate record, and failed to file a docketing statement.1
In this case, appellants have neither paid the required filing fee nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees
Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before
the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158.
Appellants failed to respond to the Court’s notice of January 7, 2025 stating that,
should appellant not pay the fee, the appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of
case). Accordingly, we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss on the ground that
appellants have not paid the filing fee after notice.
We dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
1 Appellants filed a clerk’s record but failed to file a reporter’s record. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure do not provide for dismissal of an appeal for failure to file a reporter’s record or a docketing statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marlene J. Sarres and Gerson Sosa v. Michael C. Howard and Chris Diferrante, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlene-j-sarres-and-gerson-sosa-v-michael-c-howard-and-chris-diferrante-texapp-2025.