Marlboro Holding Corp. v. Arvintz

239 A.D. 836

This text of 239 A.D. 836 (Marlboro Holding Corp. v. Arvintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marlboro Holding Corp. v. Arvintz, 239 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order directing the appellant to attorn to the receiver affirmed, without costs, on authority of Holmes v. Gravenhorst (238 App. Div. 313). Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holmes v. Gravenhorst
238 A.D. 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlboro-holding-corp-v-arvintz-nyappdiv-1933.