Marlboro Cotton Mills v. Stirling Hosiery Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Marlboro Cotton Mills v. Stirling Hosiery Mills

119 S.E. 900, 126 S.C. 343, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 186

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedNovember 5, 1923

Docket11324

StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 900 (Marlboro Cotton Mills v. Stirling Hosiery Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marlboro Cotton Mills v. Stirling Hosiery Mills, 119 S.E. 900, 126 S.C. 343, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 186 (S.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

For the reasons assigned by ITon. R D. Lide, Special Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment *346 of the Circuit Court be affirmed, as the letters and orders introduced in the cause show confirmation of sale and meeting of the minds of the parties, and the question of damages in this case is settled by the stipulation of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

For the reasons assigned by ITon. R D. Lide, Special Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment *346 of the Circuit Court be affirmed, as the letters and orders introduced in the cause show confirmation of sale and meeting of the minds of the parties, and the question of damages in this case is settled by the stipulation of the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 S.E. 900, 126 S.C. 343, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlboro-cotton-mills-v-stirling-hosiery-mills-sc-1923.