MARKUS HILL v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and VASTHI LAURORE
This text of MARKUS HILL v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and VASTHI LAURORE (MARKUS HILL v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and VASTHI LAURORE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARKUS DEANDRE HILL, Appellant,
v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, and VASTHI LAURORE, Appellees.
No. 4D19-1866
[October 16, 2019]
Appeal from State of Florida, Department of Revenue; L.T. Case Nos. 50190700195CA and CSE 2001385648.
Markus Deandre Hill, , for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee Department of Revenue.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
WARNER, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARKUS HILL v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and VASTHI LAURORE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markus-hill-v-dept-of-revenue-child-support-enforcement-and-vasthi-fladistctapp-2019.