Marks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marks v. State

423 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 5635533, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 2013·No. No. ED 99278·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Rodney Marks, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing based on application of the escape rule. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Rodney Marks, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing based on application of the escape rule. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Marks v. State, 423 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 5635533, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

423 S.W.3d 801 (Marks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.