Marks v. Moore

171 S.E. 557, 47 Ga. App. 790, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 665
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1933
Docket23315
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 S.E. 557 (Marks v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marks v. Moore, 171 S.E. 557, 47 Ga. App. 790, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 665 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant in his sworn answer admitted the execution of the note sued on, but denied that the plaintiff had title to it or the right to sue thereon. The copy attached to the petition shows that the note was made payable to ¥m. A. Estroff, and was indorsed in blank on the back by the payee. On the trial the original note was not put in evidence, and the evidence introduced by the plaintiff failed to show that the title to the note passed to him, or that he had the legal right to sue on the note. The court, therefore, did not err in awarding a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Bottoms
13 S.E.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 557, 47 Ga. App. 790, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marks-v-moore-gactapp-1933.