Marks v. Marks

40 A.D.2d 981, 338 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3194
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 20, 1972, which denied her motion to modify a judgment of divorce to provide an allowance for clothing for the two minor children of the parties. Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to the Special Term for a hearing on the factual issues presented and for a determination de novo. In our opinion, too many relevant factual issues were left undecided by Special Term. The needs of the children, the income of the defendant father and the true intent of. the parties, as manifested in the discussions as to a prospective stipulation relating to clothing provisions, are all without resolution. Since the welfare of children is at issue, a hearing must be had to determine what action is just [982] and to their benefit. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marks v. Marks, 40 A.D.2d 981, 338 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

40 A.D.2d 981 (Marks v. Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Bedford v. Village of Mount Kisco
306 N.E.2d 155 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)